The best govt money can buy

Rant du jour:

Culinary Accounting, or Cookin’ the Books!
by Mike Folkerth

Greg Easterbrook said, “Torture numbers and they will confess to anything.” Barrack Obama said, “Americans don’t torture.” Either Barrack Obama doesn’t count number-torturing as a crime or his nose is growing.

Let’s talk about unemployment numbers. . . real unemployment numbers. The announcement that the unemployment rate declined slightly to 9.4 percent in July while only 247,000 additional jobs were lost has been greeted as good news. Really?

How is it possible for the unemployment rate to essentially remain unchanged when 247,000 jobs have been lost? The reason is simple — the number of people who stopped looking for work rose dramatically. Six hundred thirty-seven thousand additional people no longer consider themselves looking for work.

If we include the normally counted number of unemployed as well as those who have recently given up looking for work and those who have taken a part-time low paying job because they can’t find full-time work, the implication is that the unemployment rate for July would be at 16.3 percent! And our president stood in his cocky stern manner and announced that employment is getting better on his watch?

What about the cash for clunkers program? To begin with, what right does the federal government have to give $4500 of our tax money to each person who has a junk car to trade in? What? You say the federal government owns the car business and is using our money to subsidize their business!

Why would we ever accept such a ridiculous expenditure of our precious tax dollars as cash for clunkers? So is it really a good program for anyone other than the federal government? No! Most of these people trading in their clunkers for your tax money owned their older cars outright and now they own a big old hairy car payment, higher taxes, higher insurance costs, higher license costs, and an asset that is depreciating faster than Barrack Obama’s ratings.

What about our government giving new home buyers $8000 as down payment assistance? What right do they have to dole out our tax money for broke people to buy new homes? I have had two of my real estate friends say that if you aren’t in the first-time-home-buyer loop, you are out of the loop altogether as the federal assistance program represents the balance of home buyers today. But then, the federal government also now owns the mortgage companies.

Wasn’t the housing bubble created by loaning people a 100% or more on their home purchases? Isn’t this a re-run of that same program? Well, not exactly, the $8000 is a gift from the federal government that won’t have to be paid back. Interestingly enough, the federal government doesn’t have any money to give out as gifts without taking it from someone else.

Even more interesting is that most of those taking advantage of our newest housing scam are in an income bracket where they pay little to no federal taxes. This newest give away is insane! Talk about torturing numbers, if it were a real crime Obama would get life without the possibility of parole!

So what about the reports that real GDP losses are slowing? And that our economy is getting better every day under the steady hand of Barrack Obama and company. Please read this excellent article by fellow blogger Pete Murphy to shed a little light on that subject.

The current government daylight heist is our healthcare. The definition of Communism is, “A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.” You decide how or if that definition fits our young president.

It’s all smoke and mirrors aimed at an ulterior motive, directed, produced, and copy written by the best government that money can buy. Its time to make some changes and I’m not talking about the changes that Obama promised.

[ Housing Doom ]

“The banks have wanted to avoid price discovery on their ‘legacy assets’ by all means possible. They do not want the world knowing how many toxic assets they really have on their books. They most certainly do not want to illuminate the scale of these losses (which might show them to be effectively insolvent), as this would expose the TARP recipients to receivership and restructuring via the FDIC, thereby breaking up their power once and for all.” -Marshall Auerback


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: