It’s Time To Kill The Electric Car, Drive A Stake Through Its Heart And Burn The Corpse

August 27, 2011

You crazy fuckers out there buying overpriced tat like Prickuses and Insights and Leafs seem very smug, thinking you are a better man than I because you, as a ‘true believer’ are alone doing something to ‘save the planet’ from big/peak/corporate oil and are actively living the ‘green’ lifestyle. Gettin’ involved. Livin’ the green dream.

Here is a reality check  [ via Seeking Alpha ]:

Relevant excerpts:

“The storage battery is one of those peculiar things which appeals to the imagination, and no more perfect thing could be desired by stock swindlers than that very self-same thing. Just as soon as a man gets working on the secondary battery it brings out his latent capacity for lying.” -Thomas Edison

When Edison was complaining about batteries, specific energies of 25 wh/kg were common. A hundred and thirty years later specific energies of 150 wh/kg are pushing the envelope. A six-fold improvement over 130 years does not provide a rational basis for prevailing expectations.

Let’s face it folks, it’s time to kill the electric car, drive a stake through its heart and burn the corpse. Companies like Tesla Motors (TSLA) are doomed because their vanity products can’t possibly make a difference and have all the environmental and economic relevance of pet rocks.

Using batteries as fuel tank replacements is a zero-sum game that consumes huge quantities of metals for the sole purpose of substituting electricity for oil. Since roughly 45% of domestic electric power is from coal fired plants and that percentage will decline very slowly, the only rational conclusion is that electric drive is unconscionable waste and pollution masquerading as conservation.

Given the nature of the investing process I don’t expect anyone to accept my logic without independently verifying the facts. I sincerely hope that this article will give at least a few investors reason to question their own assumptions in a hopium free environment. Most of us grew up in a rare period of privilege, prosperity and plenty that has seriously distorted our worldview. If we don’t accept the reality that our supply chain assumptions are fatally flawed, we can’t possibly identify realistic solutions that can be implemented at relevant scale.

I drive a used car, which gets decent mpg. I avoid the immediate depreciation suffered by new car suckers. I drive it sparingly, preferring to walk, ride public transport, or bicycle to get from point A to B. I fill it up once per month. I AM green, here me roar.

And I recycle, even though it’s a state tax scam in CA and I’d could just as easily throw it all in the garbage.

There are no political solutions for problems presented by physics.  Mother nature is beyond the reach of the law.


Obamanation

January 12, 2011

Dean Baker- Quote du jour

March 1, 2010

I don’t see anything being gained by holding housing prices higher than the market rate,” says Dean Baker, economist and co-director of the liberal Center for Economic & Policy Research in Washington.It is difficult to see why the government would want to pursue policies that would encourage people to pay too much for homes.

The article this quote comes from is Businessweek which is surprising, really. Reading this in one of those “MSM” publications that co-sponsor lies directly fed from the <ahem> Fed., Inc. (“you’re real governing body”) who substitute artfully penned opinion for fact, and slant figures to support their conclusions.

He is truly the “Deaner,” having identified and wrote often about the trouble with our bubble.

A few of us noticed.

I suggest reading the rest of the article as well, because if you like your dope straight, it is rare that you’ll find it in an officially sanctioned news source:

America’s housing market implosion was the epicenter of the Great Recession. It’s hardly surprising that the federal government directed enormous resources at the market. Besides bailing out vulnerable banks, the federal government nationalized mortgage behemoths Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, opened the lending spigot at the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), passed a first-time home buyers’ tax credit, and established a mortgage modification program for troubled homeowners. The Federal Reserve embarked on a $1.25 trillion purchase of mortgage-backed securities in an effort to engineer lower mortgage rates.

The Herculean efforts may be understandable. But they were a mistake in the early months of the downturn—and now stand as a public policy blunder in the early months of a recovery. That’s a harsh judgment, but it’s way past the time for ending taxpayer support of the housing market.

These policies are geared toward propping up home prices, the definition of a perverse public policy. Artificially holding prices at above-market levels harms new potential buyers, from young adults starting their own households to immigrants putting down stakes in the American Dream. The subsidies wrongly delay the inevitable home market price adjustment to excess supply in many markets across the country.

[ Businessweek ]

So yeah, if you start out from a disadvantage in life in this great nation, not only do you have to work triply harder than someone who started life, say, on third base, but you have the added struggle of public policy stacking the deck against you.

Many people will work hard to overcome their backgrounds and find a way to live the American dream (not home ownership, btw, but justice and equality under the rule of law) in spite of this.

It’s just that fewer and fewer will realize that dream.


“All this talk about ‘free markets‘ and the virtues of ‘private market disciplines‘ go out the window should the actual discipline of markets impose losses on these institutions.” -Marshall Auerback


Fly at your own risk

July 2, 2009

Story du jour:

Aircraft repair jobs performed by unqualified illegal alien workers, displacing qualified Americans; previous experience, speaking English not required

If you own a house, it’s probably gone down in a value.  There isn’t much of anything that you can do about that and if you are like many homedebtors, you probably prefer to crack open a Burgie(tm) and ignore that particular problem until it goes away (or the market turns around- heh).

Kind of the adult version of making like an ostrich: you just don’t want to know or think about it. La la la la fucking la.

Besides, if you still have a job, you can pay the mortgage- after all we all need a place to live.

And unless you attract disaster, chances are nothing will crash into your house. I’ll take those odds (knocks on wood).

If you are a frequent flyer, you might want to read this story (with video for the weary) out of a Dallas TV station. Or, after reading the headline you might just prefer to just ignore it.

After all, what can you do about it?

Perhaps it’s not as bad as it sounds.

The problems are probably blown all out of proportion by the media, and are most likely contained to an entirely different segment of the market than those you frequent.

It’s just one news story, and not even out of a major market. Why hasn’t the NY Times covered it? Must not be important.

We can still trust that regulatory authorities are doing their job, and haven’t taken any bribes or lined up a cushy office job after their retirement from the FAA or ICE with the companies they oversee, to occasionally look the other way.

Even with early retirement and a juicy double-dip escapade beckoning, a federal official would never neglect their sworn duty while in office and place American people at risk.

No sirree Benny.

[WFAA.com]

HT: Mish


Who regluates the regulators?


“… indentured servants who have fewer options than renters.”

June 26, 2009

Got to love them banks.

Wishful thinking

They get bailed out, and farm out the mortgage-mod grunt work to criminals, liars, and thieves (former <spit>  mortgage brokers). How’s that working out?

In March, about 10% were actually finalized.

1/10 of one percent of all  ‘mortage workouts’ actually see a reduction in principle.

Dr. Housing Bubble does an excellent job of bringing this part of the Grandest Boondoggle of Them All into sharper focus with each post. Folks, the Alt-A and option ARM tsunami is out in the middle of the Pacific and be assured, it is heading this way.

I’m not in favor of reducing principal per se, but when banks got such generous bailout terms that came right off the table (we’re in this mess together, like it or not). Shouldn’t the banks be encouraged to pass the savings on to the bailer-outers, i.e. underwater home-renters homedebtors?

That would work out similarly to the way the funding passed right through the golden goose of AIG- which shat out of their anus BILLIONS into the waiting mouths of Goldman Sucks.

BTW, a ‘workout’ completely favors the bank. If a workout is ever ‘successful’ (YMMV), it guarantees a life of indentured servitude. Term extensions, a short-term extension of the teaser rate, and small principal deferral are the main methods being used to bind the homedebtor slave.

Workouts are simply buying time, kicking the can down the road… and eventually today’s workouts fall permanently into the default column too.

You’re really better off walking away.


Debtors are the slaves to the world.


Benron Bukkake hires a professional liar

June 8, 2009

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Federal Reserve, Inc. (a privately held, for-profit entity) is on track to hire a veteran lobbyist to help manage its relations with Congress at a time of heightened attention to its role in national affairs, a source familiar with the situation said on Friday.

The Fed plans to hire Linda Robertson, who previously worked for now-defunct energy company Enron, as well as the Clinton administration.

The U.S. central bank has been at the forefront of government actions to limit damage from the financial crisis it created, which began in August 2007.

Robertson was vice president for government affairs at now-defunct energy company Enron Corp from November 2000 until she closed its Washington office in early 2002. Enron collapsed in scandal in 2001 and her work there may raise some eyebrows.

Before that, she was an assistant Treasury secretary for legislative and public affairs under then-President Bill Clinton.

[Reuters]

I shit you not.


“Knowing about art does not make a painter.” Vernon Smith on Benron Bukkake


Decline of the middle class

March 16, 2009

What Isn’t Coming Back

In other words, everyone from marketers to the evangelical movement perceived rising ownership of material goods as an “obvious” metric for “the good life.” But the entire superficial surface of jewelry, lavish cruises, huge suburban homes, etc. was based not on a foundation of savings and productive real wealth but on astonishing increases in debt. It was never sustainable, and the fantasy that it was sustainable, and perhaps even “deserved,” was always visibly absurd.

The entire edifice of consumerism is a “false god” which has now been toppled from its gold-leafed perch. Buying more and owning more did not create a sustainable, healthy happiness or a sense of self-identity; the insecurity and anxiety which were masked by shopping and prescription drugs have now been laid bare.

[Charles Hugh Smith]


“At 8% Annual Compounded Growth it will take us 11 years to return to the peak of the S&P 500.” -Dr. Housing Bubble


Please Mr. Gummint man, don’t take away my bowl!

March 3, 2009

U.S. rescue efforts may risk double-dip recession

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. companies, consumers and communities may grow so addicted to government financial help that cutting them off could trigger another recession soon after the current one ends.

[Reuters]

Pending Home Sales Down 7%

The index is at the lowest level since tracking began in 2001.

[NAR]

Does Creeping Nationalization Make Reprivatization Harder?

A New York Times article tonight, “U.S. Likely to Keep the Reins on Fannie and Freddie”, raises the specter that the mortgage giants may never return to private form. Frankly, we think that is not entirely a bad thing. Fannie and Freddie were originally agencies of the US government and were (sort of) spun out in the late 1960s, when their borrowings on top of Vietnam war funding made the Federal balance sheet look ugly. And in typical plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose fashion, the reason the GSEs have not been fully taken over is to avoid consolidating their debt onto the Federal balance sheet.

[naked capitalism]

I Shit You Not

Bernie Madoff is accused of fleecing his clients out of billions, but he said Monday he shouldn’t be forced into the poorhouse.

His lawyers are arguing that Madoff should be entitled to keep the $7 million apartment he’s currently being held in while under house arrest and $62 million.

Court papers filed on Monday state that Madoff and his lawyer say the Manhattan penthouse and the millions held in accounts of Madoff’s wife, Ruth, are not subject to seizure.

Madoff’s lawyers claim “only Ruth Madoff has a beneficial ownership” to a Manhattan apartment, about $45 million in municipal bonds on deposit at Cohmad Securities Corp., and approximately $17 million in cash in another account, Stanton said. Ruth Madoff says these assets are “unrelated” to the alleged fraud, Stanton wrote, citing her husband’s lawyer. “

[cbsnews] [BB]

Radioactive Toxic Waste: Works Just Like CDOs — For Real

Hot (radioactive) recycled metal from decommissioned nuclear power plants, among other places, is threatening to radioactively contaminate the entire world’s steel industry. The way he explained it to me, it’s just eerie how this unfolding story of risk and greed parallels the familiar dynamics of subprime [and its effect on CDO's].

[Housing Doom]


Any resemblance that 2009 has to 1929 is purely intentional.


Dirty assets

February 2, 2009

Sunday Mulling

January 11, 2009

Unintended Consequences 20th Century and Beyond
This Article by James Quinn, (Jan 5, 2009) approaches the De/in-flation debate by helpfully poiting out what will be the real Deciders for each and every one of us in the coming decade:

Twenty years of consumer debt accumulation must be unwound. This required deleveraging needs to eliminate $2 trillion of household debt. The result will be thousands of retail store closings, mall closings, restaurant closings, and auto dealership closings. The distinction between needs and wants will reveal itself like a sledgehammer….

IMHO savers are “needs” based, spendthrifts are “wants” based. Which side do you come down on?

A man outstanding in his field


Too old to rock and roll, too young to die?
…from a TF thread (home of the ursine) by commenter “Bear”  regarding Bill Gross and Warren Buffet’s investing acumen and whether it is present and accounted for:

they are stupid mostly and old…This is a fast game and they aren’t motivated by the same things they were when they were good investors, let alone mentally agile enough anymore….and yes they do have more info but its based on flawed data IMO….they’re surrounded by yes men and look for and deal in political favor for returns…they’ve gone from “investors” to “power brokers” …that is the typical permutation of success….”

I like to point out this very fact out whenever a discussion treads into pertinent territory. Since most people I know are middle-aged and up, this matter tends to get some of them very uncomfortable!

To this pair of fading Icahns we can surely add Ross, Thain, Cayne, Elmer “Dickie” Fuld, Pickens, Rubin, Pandit, Redstone, Hank-panky, Benron Bukkake,  Krekorian, Joseph Lewis, Madoff(?), Barmy Frank, Tangelo Orangezillo, Chris Doddery, Bush, Cheney, Obama, Summers, Meriwether, Krudblow, Cramer, Scholes, fill-in-the-blank. Should Jimmy Rogers be in that company? George Soros? Krugman?

The inclusion of Madoff is because my *theorem of pinnacle-envy-itis* states that

When power brokers are confronted by a once-in-a-lifetime crisis and clearly don’t know what to do, they’ll desperately cling to their cloak of invincibility and do absolutely anything and everything possible to keep-up appearances.

Now how boojy (bourgeois) is dat?

Extra credit section

Deflation has become inevitable

For a while now I have been on the fence on the inflation/deflation issue – whether the massive monetisation of bad debts by central banks and governments will lead to rapidly escalating inflation as currencies are debased or, alternatively, lead to deflation as bad debts and illiquidity undermine all commercial and financial activity in the economy. I’m now coming down on the side of deflation for a very simple reason: there is no longer any incentive to save or invest, and so debt and investment cannot increase much beyond current bloated levels.  [London Banker]

Wave ‘B’… What a Wonderful World!

The ‘C’ I am referring to in the Voyage to the Bottom of the ‘C’, represents in Elliott Wave terms the third and final leg of an A-B-C correction which is correcting an up cycle which began before America was even born. That puts this correction on a higher order than the Great Depression, a “Grand Supercycle Degree” corrective wave.  [Economic edge]


All of a nation’s laws are enforced selectively.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.